C# IStructuralEquatable nedir Ile ilgili detaylı notlar

C# IStructuralEquatable nedir Ile ilgili detaylı notlar

Blog Article

That is, you dirilik create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface.

= to provide value equality checks (vs the default reference equality check). The MSDN documentation suggests you only do it for immutable types. There are also issues involving interfaces and operator overloading.

The following example creates two identical 3-tuple objects whose components consist of three Double values. The value of the second component is Double.NaN. The example then calls the Tuple.Equals method, and it calls the IStructuralEquatable.Equals method three times. The first time, it passes the default equality comparer that is returned by the EqualityComparer.

Equals and object.ReferenceEquals. Equals is meant to be overridden for whatever sort of comparison makes the most sense for a given type, whereas ReferenceEquals emanet't be overridden and always compares by reference.

Your browser isn’t supported anymore. Update it to get the best YouTube experience and our latest features. Learn more

The following example defines a NanComparer class that implements the IStructuralEquatable interface. It compares two Double or two Single values by using the equality operator. It passes values of any other type to the default equality comparer.

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues bey the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .

In my implementation I delegated the task of calculating hash codes to the internal array. While testing it, to my great surprise, I found that my two different arrays had the same structural hash code

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues as the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .

I had the same question. When I ran LBushkin's example I was surprised to see that I got a different answer! Even though that answer başmaklık 8 upvotes, it is wrong. After a lot of 'reflector'ing, here is my take on things.

To achieve this, employee objects with matching SSN properties would be treated birli logically equal, even if they were not structurally equal. Share Improve this answer Follow

That is, you birey create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface. The interface katışıksız two members: Equals, which tests for equality by using a specified IEqualityComparer implementation, and GetHashCode, which returns identical hash codes for objects that are equal.

There is no need for an equality operator that C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri accepts different types. That should hamiş even compile. So this is a very weak excuse for having a non-generic interface that works with objects.

Specifically, I do derece know the exact type of the object. The only assumption I make is that it inherit from IStructuralEquatable.